You must agree with the terms below to view. [I Agree]

General Terms of Use

By accessing and browsing Healing Light Seminars’ Laser Research Library you accept, without limitation or qualification, the Terms of Use outlined below and acknowledge full and complete acceptance of these terms. Please review the following terms carefully. If you do not agree to these terms, you should not use the Laser Research Library.

Terms and Conditions

1.Copying or redistribution of any portion of the Laser Research Library in any manner for personal gain or commercial use, including commercial publication, or as a component of any internet, intranet or extranet database, information storage and retrieval system, or other compilation in any media now or in the future by any means is strictly prohibited.

2.Users may download these files for their personal use subject to the limitations of fair use as defined in the United States copyright laws and any additional terms or restrictions which may apply. You are granted a non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to access and use material strictly in accordance with this Agreement, solely for internal, personal, non-commercial purposes; and to print out discrete information solely for internal, personal, non-commercial purposes provided that you maintain all copyright and other policies contained therein.

3.Any party wishing to use any of these files for any purpose other than the limited purposes identified above, must request and receive prior written approval from Healing Light Seminars and/or the copyright owner. Permission shall be granted on a case-by-case basis at the sole discretion of Healing Light Seminars and/or the copyright owner.

4.This material is offered for educational purposes only. It is neither complete nor comprehensive for the conditions addressed, nor should it be relied on solely to propose a course of treatment for a particular individual nor used as a substitute for a consultation or advice from a qualified, medical or health professional. Healing Light Seminars, Inc. expressly disclaims any and all liability for any kind of loss or risk, personal or otherwise, which may be sustained as a result of the direct or indirect use of this material and makes no representations or warranties as to its accuracy or completeness.

5.You agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Healing Light Seminars, its officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, causes of action, allegations, costs, expenses, fees (including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees), judgments, liabilities, losses and damages arising from or relating to your use of this information and website.

6.Healing Light Seminars may at any time revise these Terms and Conditions by updating this posting. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the then-current Terms and Conditions.

Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) Notices; Copyright Agent

Healing Light Seminars respects the intellectual property rights of others. If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement by any content or material in this Laser Research Library, please provide the following information in writing to Healing Light Seminars Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. Section 512(c)(3) for further details):

  1. A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright.
  2. A description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed.
  3. A description of the material that you claim to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information sufficient to permit us to locate the material.
  4. Information so that we can contact you, such as address, telephone number and e-mail address.
  5. A statement that you have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  6. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that you are the copyright owner or are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of a copyright that is allegedly infringed.

Linking to the Laser Research Library

You may be granted permission to provide links to the Laser Research Library at the discretion of Healing Light Seminars and upon its terms by requesting written permission by e-mail or letter in advance from us, provided (a) that you do not remove or obscure, by framing or otherwise, the copyright notice or any other content as displayed by us in the opening page and in the body of the Laser Research Library, (b) your site does not engage in illegal, unethical or pornographic activities, and (c) you discontinue providing links to Healing Light Seminars Laser Research Library immediately upon request by us.

I Agree with these terms.

I Agree with these terms.

Provided by www.HealingLightSeminars.com
Equipment, Education and Resources for Clinical Excellence in Energetic Therapies

Violet 405 nm

Photomed Laser Surg.  2013 Feb 7. [Epub ahead of print]

Blue Laser Irradiation Generates Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species in Various Types of Cells.

Kushibiki T, Hirasawa T, Okawa S, Ishihara M.

Source

Department of Medical Engineering, National Defence Medical College , Saitama, Japan .

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production after laser irradiation in various types of cells.

Background data: ROS are considered to be the key secondary messengers produced by low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Although various mechanisms for the effects of LLLT have been proposed, and intracellular ROS were indicated as the one of the key factors, direct measurement of intracellular ROS of several types of cells after different wavelength lasers irradiation has not been reported.

Materials and methods: Various types of cells were used in this study: mouse preadipocytes (3T3-L1), prechondrocytes (ATDC5), myoblasts (C2C12), mesenchymal stromal cells (KUSA-A1), lung cancer cells (LLC), insulinoma cells (MIN6), fibroblasts (NIH-3T3), human cervix adenocarcinoma cells (HeLa), macrophages differentiated from lymphocytes (THP-1) after treatment with phorbol ester, and rat basophilic leukemia cells (RBL-2H3). Cells were irradiated with a blue laser (wavelength: 405?nm), a red laser (wavelength: 664?nm) or a near infrared laser (wavelength: 808?nm) at 100 mW/cm(2) for 60 or 120?sec. Intracellular ROS levels were measured by fluorometric assay using the intracellular ROS probe, CM-H(2)DCFDA in a flow cytometer.

Results: After a blue laser irradiation, intracellular ROS levels were increased in all types of cells. In contrast, intracellular ROS generation was not observed after irradiation with a red laser or near-infrared laser.

Conclusions: Potential sources of intracellular ROS were excited by blue laser irradiation, resulting in ROS production within cells. Although the low-level intracellular ROS should be generated after a red or a near-infrared laser irradiation, the only high level intracellular ROS were detected by the ROS probe used in this study. As ROS are considered to be key secondary messengers, the specific functional regulation of cells by laser irradiation will be studied in a future study.

BMC. Microbiol. 2012 Aug 15;12(1):176. [Epub ahead of print]

Inhibitory effects of 405 nm irradiation on Chlamydia trachomatis growth and characterization of the ensuing inflammatory response in HeLa cells.

Wasson CJ, Zourelias JL, Aardsma NA, Eells JT, Ganger MT, Schober JM, Skwor TA.

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND:

Chlamydia trachomatis is an intracellular bacterium that resides in the conjunctival and reproductive tract mucosae and is responsible for an array of acute and chronic diseases. A percentage of these infections persist even after use of antibiotics, suggesting the need for alternative treatments. Previous studies have demonstrated anti-bacterial effects using different wavelengths of visible light at varying energy densities, though only against extracellular bacteria. We investigated the effects of visible light (405 and 670 nm) irradiation via light emitting diode (LEDs) on chlamydial growth in end cervical epithelial cells, HeLa, during active and penicillin-induced persistent infections. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of this photo treatment on the ensuing secretion of IL-6 and CCL2, two pro-inflammatory cytokines that have previously been identified as immunopathologic components associated with trichiasis in vivo.

RESULTS:

C. trachomatis-infected HeLa cells were treated with 405 or 670 nm irradiation at varying energy densities (0 — 20 J/cm2). Bacterial growth was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR analyzing the 16S: GAPDH ratio, while cell-free supernatants were examined for IL-6 and Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL2) production. Our results demonstrated a significant dose-dependent inhibitory effect on chlamydial growth during both active and persistent infections following 405 nm irradiation. Diminished bacterial load corresponded to lower IL-6 concentrations, but was not related to CCL2 levels. In vitro modeling of a persistent C. trachomatis infection induced by penicillin demonstrated significantly elevated IL-6 levels compared to C. trachomatis infection alone, though 405 nm irradiation had a minimal effect on this production.

CONCLUSION:

Together these results identify novel inhibitory effects of 405 nm violet light on the bacterial growth of intracellular bacterium C. trachomatis in vitro, which also coincides with diminished levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Apr;27(2):221-6.

Blue 470-nm light kills methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro.

Enwemeka CS, Williams D, Enwemeka SK, Hollosi S, Yens D.

School of Health Professions, Behavioral, and Life Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, New York 11568-8000, USA.Enwemeka@nyit.edu

BACKGROUND DATA: In a previous study, we showed that 405-nm light photo-destroys methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The 390-420 nm spectral width of the 405-nm superluminous diode (SLD) source may raise safety concerns in clinical practice, because of the trace of ultraviolet (UV) light within the spectrum.

OBJECTIVE: Here we report the effect of a different wavelength of blue light, one that has no trace of UV, on two strains of MRSA–the US-300 strain of CA-MRSA and the IS-853 strain of HA-MRSA–in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We cultured and plated each strain, and then irradiated each plate with 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 J/cm2 of energy a single time, using a 470-nm SLD phototherapy device. The irradiated specimens were then incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 h. Subsequently, digital images were made and quantified to obtain colony counts and the aggregate area occupied by bacteria.

RESULTS: Photo-irradiation produced a statistically significant dose-dependent reduction in both the number and the aggregate area of colonies formed by each strain (p < 0.001). The higher the dose the more bacteria were killed, but the effect was not linear, and was more impressive at lower doses than at higher doses. Nearly 30% of both strains was killed with as little as 3 J/cm2 of energy. As much as 90.4% of the US-300 and the IS-853 colonies, respectively, were killed with an energy density of 55 J/cm2. This same dose eradicated 91.7% and 94.8% of the aggregate area of the US-300 and the IS-853 strains, respectively.

CONCLUSION: At practical dose ranges, 470-nm blue light kills HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA in vitro, suggesting that a similar bactericidal effect may be attained in human cases of cutaneous and subcutaneous MRSA infections.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;75(7):1932-7. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

Inactivation of bacterial pathogens following exposure to light from a 405 nanometer light-emitting diode array.

Maclean M, MacGregor SJ, Anderson JG, Woolsey G.

The Robertson Trust Laboratory for Electronic Sterilisation Technologies, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow, Scotland. michellemaclean@eee.strath.ac.uk

This study demonstrates the susceptibility of a variety of medically important bacteria to inactivation by 405-nm light from an array of light-emitting diodes (LEDs), without the application of exogenous photosensitizer molecules. Selected bacterial pathogens, all commonly associated with hospital-acquired infections, were exposed to the 405-nm LED array, and the results show that both gram-positive and gram-negative species were successfully inactivated, with the general trend showing gram-positive species to be more susceptible than gram-negative bacteria. Detailed investigation of the bactericidal effect of the blue-light treatment on Staphylococcus aureus suspensions, for a range of different population densities, demonstrated that 405-nm LED array illumination can cause complete inactivation at high population densities: inactivation levels corresponding to a 9-log(10) reduction were achieved. The results, which show the inactivation of a wide range of medically important bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, demonstrate that, with further development, narrow-spectrum 405-nm visible-light illumination from an LED source has the potential to provide a novel decontamination method with a wide range of potential applications.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Dec;24(6):684-8

In vitro bactericidal effects of 405-nm and 470-nm blue light.

Guffey JS, Wilborn J.

Physical Therapy Plus, Bauxite, Arkansas 72011, USA. drguffey@earthlink.net

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the bactericidal effect of 405- and 470-nm light on two bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in vitro.

BACKGROUND DATA: It is well-known that UV light kills bacteria, but the bactericidal effects of UV may not be unique since recent studies indicate that blue light produces a somewhat similar effect. The effects of blue light seem varied depending on wavelength, dose and the nature of the bacteria, hence this study.

METHODS: Two common aerobes, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and anaerobic Propionibacterium acnes were tested. Each organism was treated with Super Luminous Diode probes with peak emission at 405 and 470 nm. Treatment was timed to yield 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 Jcm2 doses. Colony counts were performed and compared to untreated controls.

RESULTS: The 405-nm light produced a dose dependent bactericidal effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus (p < .05), achieving as much as 95.1% and nearly 90% kill rate for each, respectively. The 470-nm light effectively killed Pseudomonas aeruginosa at all dose levels, but only killed Staphylococcus aureus at 10 and 15 J cm2. With this wavelength, as much as 96.5% and 62% reduction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus was achieved, respectively. Neither of the two wavelengths proved bactericidal with anaerobic Propionibacterium acnes.

CONCLUSION: The results indicate that, in vitro, 405- and 470-nm blue light produce dose dependent bactericidal effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus but not Propionibacterium acnes.

Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Dec;24(6):680-3.

Effects of combined 405-nm and 880-nm light on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro.

Guffey JS, Wilborn J.

Physical Therapy Plus, Bauxite, Arkansas 72011, USA. drguffey@earthlink.net

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a combination of 405-nm blue light and 880-nm infrared light on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro.

BACKGROUND DATA: Reports indicate that certain wavelengths and treatment parameters of light promote the growth of bacteria, but our earlier study indicates that light at specific wavelengths and intensities are bactericidal for specific organisms (1).

METHODS: Two common aerobes, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested because of their frequent isolation from skin infections and wounds. Each organism was treated simultaneously with a combination of 405-nm and 880-nm light emitted by a cluster of Super Luminous Diodes (SLDs). Doses of 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 Jcm2 were used. Colony counts were performed and compared to untreated controls using Student t tests and one-way ANOVA with Tukey and Scheffe post hoc analyses.

RESULTS: The results revealed significant dose-dependent bactericidal effects of the combined blue and infrared light on Staphylococcus aureus (F 4,94 = 5.38, p = 0.001) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (F 4,95 = 21.35, p < 0.001). With P. aeruginosa, the treatment reduced the number of bacteria colonies at all doses, achieving statistical significance at 1, 3, and 20 J cm2 doses and reducing bacterial colony by as much as 93.8%; the most effective dose being 20 J cm2. Irradiation of S. aureus resulted in statistically significant decreases in bacterial colonies at all dose levels; the most decrease, 72%, was also achieved with 20 Jcm2.

CONCLUSION: Appropriate doses of combined 405-nm and 880-nm phototherapy can kill Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro, suggesting that a similar effect may be produced in clinical cases of bacterial infection.

Med Microbiol. 1995 Jan;42(1):62-6

Killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by low-power laser light.

Wilson M, Yianni C.

Department of Microbiology, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Sciences, University of London.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) could be sensitised by toluidine blue O (TBO) to killing by light from a low-power helium/neon (HeNe) laser. Suspensions containing c. 10(10) cfu of MRSA were irradiated with light from a 35 mW HeNe laser (energy dose: 0.5-2.1 J) in the presence of TBO (1.6-12.5 micrograms/ml) and the survivors were enumerated. The kills attained depended on both the light energy dose and concentration of TBO employed. A 4.47 log10 reduction in the viable count was achieved with a TBO concentration of 12.5 micrograms/ml and a light dose of 2.1 J (energy density 43 J/cm2). MRSA were susceptible to killing by the laser light within 30 s of exposure to the TBO. The results of this study have demonstrated that MRSA can be rapidly sensitised by TBO to killing by HeNe laser light and that killing depends on the light energy dose and sensitiser concentration.